The war between little devices that you jam into your ear canal continues without end.
This week, U.K. tech startup released the follow-up to 2021's surprisingly really good Ear (1) wireless earbuds. About a year and a half later, Ear (2) is here with promised enhancements to sound quality and battery life, a new $150 price, and the same cool transparent plastic look from before.
SEE ALSO: Apple's AirPods might one day help you hear betterAs such, it's time to get to work doing the thing you have to do with any new pair of wireless earbuds: Compare them to AirPods. Specifically, the third-gen $170 model that's closest to Ear (2) in price. Here's how the two audio devices stack up.
The most subjective category by far, physical design is also probably the least important thing about any pair of earbuds. They're for listening to, not looking at. That said, as the writer of this article, I declare Nothing the winner in the looks department, without much of a contest. In fact, they basically look the same as Ear (1), a design so cool it didn't need to be changed.
I just think transparent plastic casing on technology is cool. AirPods definitely look nice, fitting naturally into Apple's antiseptic plastic white aesthetic, but they aren't nearly as eye-catching. That said, the third-gen AirPods are comfortable to wear for long sessions, as are Nothing's earbuds. Neither of these devices is a loser here so much as one of them is just a little cooler than the other.
Winner: Nothing Ear (2)
This one almost isn't fair.
As a sort of entry-level option without a lot of higher-end features like active noice cancelation (more on that in a minute), the third-gen AirPods naturally don't have much in the way of settings to play with. Sure, you can turn off automatic in-ear detection or lower the volume of sound effects, but that's about it.
You stick them in your ear, listen to whatever you want to listen to, and then take them out. This is a perfectly valid approach to technology, but unfortunately it doesn't look as nice next to what Nothing has to offer.
Ear (2) setup requires downloading the Nothing X app from the App Store or Play Store. It takes a minute, but it's worth it. Nothing X gives users the ability to adjust noise cancelation, remap touch commands, and even take a test to find out if the silicone ear seals fit properly in your ears. It's not a mind-blowing number of options, but it's more than what Apple offers.
Oh, and you can access those options on an Android phone, unlike AirPods.
Winner: Nothing Ear (2)
Sound quality is tougher to compare because it requires side-by-side testing that I'm not currently equipped to do. With that in mind, though, it's worth noting that Apple has always had excellent sound quality in its earbuds, and reviews from outlets like The Verge and Wired have heavily praised the sound in Ear (2). You probably can't go wrong here.
The thing that sets Nothing apart in this category for me is the presence of active noise cancelation. This feature has become so standard in earbuds in this price range that it's frankly a little absurd that the cheapest AirPods with ANC are $250. One of these devices will let you keep listening while a train rolls by and one of them won't. It's as simple as that.
Winner: Nothing Ear (2)
As for battery life, Apple can go home knowing it picked up at least one win today, though it sort of comes on a technicality.
Nothing rates Ear (2) for up to 6.3 hours of playback on a single charge with ANC turned off. Turn ANC on, however, and they're only rated for four hours of playback. ANC is such a huge selling point of Ear (2) compared to the third-gen AirPods that I can't really imagine using them with it off for any extended period of time.
On the other hand, Apple rates its ANC-less AirPods for six hours of playback on a single charge. It's a little less than what Nothing offers in ideal conditions, but in terms of practical use, Apple wins this one.
Winner: AirPods
You can probably tell where this is going.
Nothing Ear (2) is a superior product to the third-gen AirPods in most of the ways that matter. They look cooler, have more features, and sound better by virtue of including ANC. They're also $20 cheaper than Apple's $170 earbuds and work better with Android phones. It's not that close of a competition.
Still, Apple's earbuds are totally fine and might be preferable if you don't care about ANC or just want something that works seamlessly with your iPhone. Neither of these earbuds are bad; one of them is just better than the other.
Winner: Nothing Ear (2)
Copyright © 2023 Powered by
Nothing Ear (2) vs. AirPods (3rd gen): Specs, features, and more-书香门户网
sitemap
文章
17
浏览
95216
获赞
7
Dyson introduces air purifier that destroys formaldehyde
Remember the terrible smell in ninth-grade biology when you dissected a frog? That's formaldehyde, aDigital art sales aren't done. These Bitcoin artworks are going for thousands.
The landscape of art has invariably shifted over the last few years thanks to NFTs and the onset ofOn Threads, users say they're flooded with pro
I haven't opened Threads, Meta's hopeful rival to X/Twitter, for months. But I did on the first dayBest free online courses from MIT
TL;DR:A wide range of online courses from MIT are available for free on edX. You can find a wide ranGoogle's new Chromecast has a remote and an interface called Google TV
Google's Chromecast product line has stood out for years among streaming hardware because, unlike RoTaylor Swift and shirtless Jason Kelce put on a show at the Chiefs, Bills game
Taylor Swift and Kelce inspired lots of memes and chatter Sunday night into Monday morning. And no,Viral YouTube video lambasts Disney's Star Wars hotel via 4
Disney's massively expensive and spectacularly wrongheaded Star Wars hotel closed last year. But inBluetooth sex toys and VR: how people are having sex in virtual reality
You load into a public VR world. At first, things seem pretty innocent — until you enter the sTesting Reliability: Puget Systems' List of Tried and True PC Hardware
We've all been there. You want to buy a new graphics card, you read the reviews, and settle on the bUsher's Super Bowl Halftime Show blew up the internet
The Apple Music Super Bowl LVIII Halftime Show (yes, you have to say the full name) is finally hereTaylor Swift and shirtless Jason Kelce put on a show at the Chiefs, Bills game
Taylor Swift and Kelce inspired lots of memes and chatter Sunday night into Monday morning. And no,Best delivery deal: Get an annual membership to Instacart+ for just $84.15
SAVE 15%: A yearly membership to Instacart+ is on sale for $84.15 at Best Buy, down from the normalApple now gives customers a full year to buy AppleCare+
If you bought an iPhone recently, Apple has some good news for you.Bloomberg reported Monday that foBest air purifier deal: Coway air purifiers are up to 35% off at Amazon
Welcome to March. The month when sunsets get later each day and we start to feel hope that warmth wiDipsea, Quinn, and others: Your guide to audio erotica
If the videos on Pornhub don't do it for you, there's plenty of visual porn alternatives out there.